South Dakota Bicycle Coalition

27 Jan, 2010

Three Foot Law Fits With Rural Roads

Posted by: admin In: 3 Feet Please

SB 70 remains absent from the Senate Transportation Committee agenda. We’re monitoring – waiting for just the right moment to contact the members of the committee.

By Jessica Giard, SDBC Board Secretary

When I think of the need for a 3-foot law, I think of South Dakota’s rural roads. These roads are what make this state great for long-distance bicycling and touring by bicycle. Scenery is unmatched. And, as a cyclist, you experience that unmatched scenery unlike you would in a vehicle. And, that, I think, is a huge magnet for bicycle tourists.

BUT these rural roads tend to have little to no shoulder, and cyclists are likely to share the road with motorists unaccustomed to safely sharing the road. These may even be the type to honk at you for using the road (if not more egregious acts), but wouldn’t think twice of a pedestrian walking on the side of the road.

Living in Chamberlain, one road that fits this bill is Highway 50 heading north out of Chamberlain. I’ve driven it, and I’ve cycled it. Some of you have, too. Following the Missouri River, the scenery is both amazing & challenging.

I have been told I’m crazy for bicycling that road. Maybe I am, especially considering the non-existent shoulder, the heavy spring & summer recreational traffic (RVs and trailered boats) and people driving the hills & curves too fast.

But, here’s the thing. Roads like Highway 50 – which connect South Dakota’s rural communities – are exactly why a 3-foot law should be considered. These are the roads that carry bicycle tourists across the state. These are roads that the pockets of communities of bicyclists in South Dakota’s communities use for riding.

Until all the highways in South Dakota are built with wide shoulders and lanes meant for sharing, a 3-foot law will serve as a standard, objective measure to keep cyclists and motorists safely sharing the road.

The existing law does not provide a solid enough measure of what safe passing of a cyclist is. By standardizing 3 feet – which some say isn’t enough – is a start to support a campaign to safely share the road with South Dakota’s growing bicycling community.

2 Responses to "Three Foot Law Fits With Rural Roads"

1 | KartaPurkh S Khalsa

January 28th, 2010 at 7:02 am

Avatar

You know, it sounds like fun but riding with no shoulders on a heavily traveled highway with rec-vees speeding past kind of takes the “fun” out of it and adds danger. I would love to travel alongside the Missouri River and follow Lewis & Clarke but I also value my noggin and limbs too much to put myself in harm’s way like that. Ride safe, you guys.

2 | Jason Harms

February 1st, 2010 at 8:17 pm

Avatar

Be careful what you ask for. Does anyone think that SDCL 32-20B-5 (shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway) has made bicycling any better. Compare what you think that law means for traffic control to SDCL 32-26-1. While I have seen some tractors and forklifts hug the edge of the roadway, most of the vehicles going less that the average are using the middle of the road. The special law for bicycles allows people to discriminate against us.
I once had a county sheriff yell at me out his window that I had to get farther to the right. I went to his office the next day to ask him why. Sighting SDCL 32-20B-5 he thought I could not be in the middle of my lane in a no passing zone on a 2 lane road 3 miles outside of town. There were three of us riding at the time.
I have had a patrol captain tell me: riding in the middle of a right hand lane of a 5 lane road is not far enough to the right, if there is a shoulder I have to ride on the shoulder, and ‘my safety’ is not a valid reason to move from the right, despite the fact that 32-20B-5 has the wording “included but not limited to”.
If they would enforce SDCL 32-26-26 (driver of an overtaking vehicle shall pass at a safe distance to the side of an overtaken vehicle), we would not need a 3 foot law.
Is 3 feet enough? I am about 6 feet tall. If I hit something and fall over, parts of me could be over 6 feet from where I am riding.
Do we really want another discriminatory law?
If I were to write a discriminatory law for bicycles it would say something like: When passing a bicycle and the next lane is clear, you must yield full lane to the bicycle. When the next lane is not clear you must pass the bicycle as if it is another vehicle.
Pedaling 6000 miles a year, I know there is nothing wrong with the roads or laws we already have. Education is what we need.

Comment Form

Facebook


  • Amy Blackstone: I would like to help with the legislative approach to getting the 3ft law passed in South Dakota. Please let me know what role I can serve to assist.
  • Joe Mizereck: Caitlin, well said. And among those voices that need to be heard are all the loved ones of those who ride. From wives to parents to children to moms
  • Eric N: Someone want to tell me how a motor vehicle is going to know a cyclist is in the road & will need 3 feet of passing room if they, ya know, CAN'T S